Monday, May 18, 2009

Source #25

  1. What is your source? http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L30472039.htm
  2. Who is your source? By Alister Doyle, Environment Correspondent
  3. What are their credentials? I don't think they have amazing credentials because I have never heard of them beofore, but I guess that doesn't mean anything. They could be have good credentials.
  4. What does your source say about your topic? China, which rejects criticism that it is doing too little to confront climate change, says that its population is now 1.3 billion against 1.6 billion if it had not imposed tough birth control measures in the late 1970s. The number of births avoided equals the entire population of the United States. Beijing says that fewer people means less demand for energy and lower emissions of heat-trapping gases from burning fossil fuels.
  5. Do you believe your source? I do believe this source.
  6. Why or why not? I believe this source for some of the same reasons as I believed the other sources I have found. It makes some sense, but I still dont agree with it.

No comments:

Post a Comment